Variability of three activated clotting time point-of-care systems in cardiac surgery: reinforcing available evidence.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) requires the administration of anticoagulant drugs to maintain ACT ranges 400-600 seconds, which requires exhaustive coagulation monitoring for which various point-of-care devices are available. However, there is variability between them, so we aimed to compare the values in ACT measurement. METHODS: Simultaneous ACT measurements were performed with the Hemochron Response®, Hemostasis Management System Plus® (HMS Plus®) and Hemochron Signature® systems. RESULTS: A total of 255 simultaneous measurements were taken, the mean and standard deviation (SD) of each device were: Hemochron Signature® 361.1 seconds (SD: 156.9), HMS Plus® 412.8 seconds (SD: 180.9) and Hemochron Response® 422.8 seconds (SD: 187.9), being these differences statistically significant (Fridman's test p < 0.01). For comparisons the Bland-Altman method was used, resulting the Hemochron Response® has 61.7 seconds higher mean values than the Hemochron Signature®, the Hemochron Response® 10 seconds higher than the HMS Plus® and the HMS Plus® 51.7 seconds higher than the Hemochron Signature®. CONCLUSION: The differences found in comparisons are considered to be clinically relevant, which is why it is considered important to make the variability of the different monitoring systems known and to take them into account for optimal control of this parameter and its clinical repercussions.

Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Donation After Circulatory Death (Controlled and Uncontrolled): Metabolic Differences and Kidney Transplantation Evolution.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze metabolic differences during normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) between the dissimilar types of donation after circulatory death, uncontrolled (uDCD) and controlled (cDCD), and the evolution of the transplanted kidneys. METHODS: Observational, prospective, cohort study. We included patients from uDCD and cDCD maintained with NRP in 2017. Six consecutive blood gases were collected with determination of pH and lactic acid. Creatinine levels were monitored at 24 hours, 3 months, and 6 months after transplant and the need for renal replacement therapy was evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, presenting the qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range [IQR]). We used χ2 testing for bivariate analysis of qualitative variables. RESULTS: We collected 18 donors. Fifteen out of 18 (83.3%) were men with a median of 51 years (IQR, 46-60). Eleven out of 18 (61.1%) were cDCD and 7 out of 18 (38.9%) were uDCD. The blood gas results are illustrated in Table 1. A total of 28 renal transplants were obtained with a median age of 47 years (IQR, 45-57); 83% were male. Ten out of 28 (35.7%) came from uDCD and 18 out of 28 (64.7%) from cDCD. Table 2 shows the monitoring of the creatinine values of the recipients after the transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: There are more metabolic disorders in our series in uDCD organ donation compared with cDCD. The recovery of the renal function of organs from uDCD is slower than that of cDCD, however; the tendency is toward normality.